Get Adobe Flash player
Our News by Month

An oral contract is so full of holes that it is unlikely that anyone will try to impose it. This decision, although considering another issue as a whole, is interesting in this context, since the judge recognized an oral agreement for a lease: Thank you all. I`m considering the 50/50 option to pay half a month`s rent to keep things calm. In the search for the research and the question, it appears that the benefit is lacking and that the written contract requirement is part of the oral contract that has not been concluded. Also, I don`t have the keys and I probably won`t get them. This decision is remarkable because of the background: the owner bought an object and closed an oral (!) Contract with the tenant, but did not make the keys available to him until a few months later. He always demanded the rent from the date of the verbal agreement. The first court ruled in his favour (confirming the validity of the verbal agreement). Conclusion: an oral contract becomes legal only if mandatory measures are taken to make it valid.

In this case, the validation measure consisted of taking possession of this property by being reduced in turn, which allowed to give its consent to the conditions and the occupation of this property. It is up to the details of the “verbal agreement to begin the recruitment process” to know whether an exchange agreement has been concluded or simply proposed. Z.B. “You and I agree that I will pay you a contract $X in exchange for Y due Z.” Oral contracts are NOT a moral issue. The owner claims a legally binding oral contract (in her view) and the decision I have quoted above supports her opinion. Contrary to the general assumption that only written contracts are legally binding, oral contracts can also be legally binding. According to WAZ, oral contracts, with a few exceptions in sales law, are adopted as legally binding agreements. There were certain requirements for “electronic trade agreements” for the provision of goods or the provision of telemedicine services for the conclusion of a contract. The client must have the technical means. B to correct input errors before ordering. In addition, the company must inform the customer of the available languages and the receipt of the order by the company. Under German law, oral contracts are in some cases as binding as written contracts.

Tenants` right is one of those cases (on the other hand, you have not purchased any property, the number of times you have shaken hands, unless you have stamped a written contract of a notary). However, the Oberlandesgericht Dusseldorf (reference number 10 U 60/10) argued that, regardless of whether a valid contract was registered orally, the rental obligation begins with the tenant`s appropriation of the rental property, which usually occurs when the keys are handed over. It is the owner`s duty to prove such a discount. As this was not the case, the owner`s appeal was dismissed. I am afraid you misunderstood: the court explicitly recognized the validity of the oral contract, but decided that the obligation to actually pay the rent only begins when the tenant has access to the premises. It is very unusual in Germany for them to be able to enter into an oral contract. German businessmen prefer all the conditions and agreements that have been written and signed in a legal format. So there was no legal contract, oral or not, so no worries for the operation. Even after the “alleged” oral contract, the owner must submit a written contract as agreed. The owner never produced it, thus violating this contract if there had ever been one.

Given the legal statement of the Oberlandesgericht Dusseldorf, which resembles the operation, this was not the case. German labour law is not summed up in a single piece of legislation. Instead, there are a whole series of provisions of the Civil Code (BGB) as well as various legislative provisions.